The victory would make him a living legend throughout the world (its a stunner of a sequence, despite the awkward CGI gore effects) before establishing a pattern in which his accomplishments are underscored with extended flashbacks to his younger days that illustrate how he developed as a thinker, a warrior and as a person.That dream quickly turned into a nightmare as the resulting film was savaged by critics for being a miscast muddle and ignored by audiences that had turned out to see similarly themed films like Gladiator and Troy in droves.
Alexander Revisited The Final Cut 2004 Torrent Cracked A NastyEven Colin Farrell seemed to turn against it when, a week after its release, he appeared on Saturday Night Live and cracked a nasty joke about the film in his monologue. ![]() However, even as he was reestablishing his career with such films as World Trade Center, Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps and Savages, it appeared as Stone was unwilling to simply let Alexander fade into the mists of misbegotten screen history. In 2005, when the film, which originally ran for 175 minutes arrived on DVD, Stone prepared a Directors Cut that saw him restructure some elements, delete 25 minutes of footage and add 17 minutes of unseen scenes into a 167-minute version that was actually shorter than the original. And yet, Stone still couldnt get the story out of his system and in 2007, he released a so-called Final Cut that replaced the deleted 25 minutes along with another 40 minutes of additional scenes making their debut in a version that, after the trimming of some now superfluous material, now clocked in at 214 minutes. With the films 10th anniversary approaching, Stone has returned to the project that has obsessed him for nearly two decades with Alexander: The Ultimate Cut, a 207-minute-long refinement of the Final Cut, which he promises will be his final say on the subject and was recently released on Blu-ray. Even in a film culture in which there are at least five separate cuts of Blade Runner floating around, this might seem at first blush to be overkill on Stones part and begs the question of whether this new and final version can possibly rehabilitate the terrible reputation that the film has been carrying around since its initial release. The various expansions and rejiggerings have improved it immeasurably, and what was once a head-scratching mess has reformed into an undeniably fascinating example of epic cinema. Like many observers at the time of its original release, I thought that Stone had stumbled badly with Alexander in ways that almost defied reason. The essentially straightforward narrative was a surprisingly safe choice for a filmmaker who was usually more inventive. The one major diversion from the chronologya lengthy flashback to the murder of Alexanders father, King Phillip of Macedonia ( Val Kilmer ), that lead to his ascension to the thronecame so late in the proceedings and lasted so long that it felt like an afterthought and brought the whole thing to a dead halt. The narration by the elderly version of Ptolemy ( Anthony Hopkins ), one of Alexanders trusted aides, felt like something tacked on to help guide viewers who might not be versed in the particulars of the subject at hand. Having suggested that his film would deal in a straightforward manner with Alexanders bisexuality, Stone chickened out on the man-on-man aspect by eliminating all but a couple of brief, longing glances between Alexander and his childhood friend Hephastion ( Jared Leto ), while emphasizing a hot and heavy sex scene between him and bride Roxane ( Rosario Dawson ) and the sexual tension between him and his mother Olympias (an aspect underlined by casting Angelina Jolie as the heros mother despite being only a year older than Farrell). Instead of giving viewers time to get to know the characters and to fully absorb the wealth of historical details on display, the film hurried along from incident to incident while reducing the character-driven material to such a degree that there were large stretches in which it was hard to understand what was going on. As for the battle scenes, they often felt choppy and disorganized and failed to illustrate either the savagery of the combat (this was not helped by the addition of some fairly cartoonish-looking CGI gore) or the tactical brilliance that led Alexander to one stunning victory after another. The whole thing just felt small, in scope if not in scale, and if ever there was a cinematic subject that required a certain heedless grandeur, it is Alexander the Great. Nearly all of these flaws have been addressed through Stones tweaks over the years. While Alexander: The Ultimate Cut may still have some problems that no amount of reediting or restructuring can overcome, it is now an incontestably better work than it once was and deserves to be considered as the proper version of the film in the way that the full length Heavens Gate is now regarded after its years in the cinematic wilderness. For starters, it now feels like the epic it was always meant to beat 207 minutes (complete with an intermission), it finally has time to breathe and to allow viewers to acclimate themselves to the surroundings. More importantly, the additional running time allows Stone to more fully flesh out his characters so that we get a better understanding of who they are and what they are hoping to accomplish. Oddly enough, even though this version of Alexander is considerably longer than the original, it actually feels shorter because the scenes now have a proper rhythm. Alexander Revisited The Final Cut 2004 Torrent Movie That BegsThe only downside is that even though it is now a movie that begs to be seen on the big screen, virtually anyone who wishes to see it will have to make do at home. I know it will never happen but it would be wonderful if Warner Brothers were to actually show this in a few theaters as a throwback to the old roadshow days and to allow it to be seen under the most ideal circumstances.) Instead of the straightforward chronology, Stone has restructured the narrative. After a flash-forward to Alexanders death and some historical ground-laying from Ptolemy, the story proper begins with a lengthy depiction of Alexanders historic triumph over the Persians in the Battle of Gaugamela.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |